Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X

ICC World Cup 2010: Paul Adams questions Kane Williamson's ethics for not walking out after getting edge

ICC World Cup 2010: Paul Adams questions Kane Williamsons ethics for not walking out after getting edge
Williamson Shines In Kiwi Win. South Africa Out Of Semi Final

Birmingham, June 20: The cricketing fraternity is applauding New Zealand skipper Kane Williamson's match-winning knock against South Africa in a low-scoring thriller at Edgbaston in the ICC Cricket World Cup 2019 here Wednesday (June 19).

However, former South Africa spinner Paul Adams has questioned Williamson's integrity after he did not walk out despite being caught behind by wicketkeeper Quinton de Kock. The right-handed batsman,, who had luck in his favour all through the game, was caught-behind by de Kock in the 38th over off the bowling of leg-spinner Imran Tahir.

CWC 2019 Special Site | Points Table | Stats

Tahir was the only one to appeal for a caught behind but he didn't find any support from the glovesman and skipper Faf du Plessis didn't think of reviewing it. Williamson was at 76 then.

However, ultra-edge later confirmed that there was faint edge which the wicketkeeper failed to notice. Williamson's dismissal could have proved crucial for the Proteas as he was the biggest thorn in their way to victory.

Not fair to blame de Kock for not going for DRS against Williamson

Williamson struck a composed unbeaten century as New Zealand posted a four-wicket win over South Africa.

"Why didn't Kane Williamson walk," Adams wrote on his twitter page sparking a debate. He further added in another tweet: "Kane Williamson was Mankad after he didn't walk. Would he be upset."

South Africa skipper Faf du Plessis, in the post-match presser, explained that he trusted de Kock's judgement and that's why he didn't go for a review.

"We weren't aware of it. I think I was at long on at the time, and Quinny is the closest to the action. He's always my go to man," du Plessis said.

"I just thought it was a plain miss. I just heard about it now at the post match that he said he had a nick on it. But even Kane said he didn't know he had to fine tune it. He would have referred it. But that's not where the game was won and lost," he added.

(With inputs from PTI)

For Quick Alerts
ALLOW NOTIFICATIONS
For Daily Alerts

Love Cricket? Prove it! Play myKhel Fantasy Cricket here

Story first published: Thursday, June 20, 2019, 15:16 [IST]
Other articles published on Jun 20, 2019
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Mykhel sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Mykhel website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more