The absence of Indian cricket legend Sunil Gavaskar from the Border-Gavaskar Trophy presentation ceremony following the conclusion of the Sydney Test has already sparked significant controversy.
And now BCCI Vice-President Rajeev Shukla openly criticised Cricket Australia (CA) for the oversight, stating that both Gavaskar and Allan Border should have been present on the podium.

Gavaskar, whose name is part of the trophy's legacy, was in the stadium during the ceremony after Australia secured a historic 3-1 series victory as he was part of the commentators' panel for the official broadcasters. This marked the first time in a decade that Australia reclaimed the Border-Gavaskar Trophy. However, the moment was marred by Gavaskar's exclusion, a decision that left many fans and cricket officials puzzled.
Taking to X (formerly Twitter), Rajeev Shukla voiced his discontent, agreeing with calls for better acknowledgment of Gavaskar's contributions to the series' prestige. He tweeted: "It happened when Gavaskar was present in the stadium. Trophy is in their names, and one of them was not invited to the podium. After four years, who knows whether both will be present at the stadium? Both together would have been a rare visual."*
Gavaskar himself addressed the issue in an interview with ABC SPORT, revealing he had been informed before the series that he would not be part of the presentation if India lost or failed to draw the series. "I'm not feeling sad, but I'm just feeling a little perplexed. It's the Border-Gavaskar Trophy; both of us should have been there," he remarked.
The series victory was a momentous occasion for Australia, eliminating India from the World Test Championship race and signaling a resurgence in their cricketing dominance. Yet, the handling of the trophy presentation drew criticism for missing an opportunity to celebrate the joint legacy of Border and Gavaskar.
This incident has reignited discussions about the need for greater respect and recognition for cricketing legends during such landmark events. As the cricketing world reflects on Australia's triumph, Gavaskar's exclusion from the presentation remains a controversial footnote in an otherwise historic series.