A former selector has drawn parallels between Gautam Gambhir's coaching style and that of ex-coach Greg Chappell, remarking that the 'Chappell approach' isn't effective in the Indian cricket.
"You need to choose your style-either adopt a Ravi Shastri-like approach, engaging with the media, delivering impactful soundbites, and building players up as alpha personalities," he commented as per PTI.

"Or be like Rahul Dravid, Gary Kirsten or John Wright, who would remain aloof, letting the players hog the limelight. The 'Chappell Way' doesn't work in India. Gambhirs or Shastris or Dravids will go but players will stay," the former selector, who toured frequently during Shastri's tenure as coach, he further added.
Gambhir's coaching approach has faced scrutiny, with reports suggesting differences between him and some senior players. Sources indicate that Gambhir was dissatisfied with certain players making specific requests regarding hotel preferences and practice schedules during the Australia tour. On the other hand, players reportedly felt there was a lack of clear communication from his side.
However, reports suggest that the BCCI is not inclined to take immediate decisive action. The upcoming Champions Trophy could prove pivotal for Gambhir, as a poor showing in the tournament might place his role as coach in jeopardy.
Adding to Gautam Gambhir's troubles, the BCCI leadership is reportedly unhappy with the conduct of the head coach's personal assistant during the Australia tour. Concerns were raised about the PA's pervasive presence, which seemingly interfered with team operations.
"Why was his PA sitting in the car specified for national selectors? They can't even discuss things in private with an unknown third person in the car. Why was he allotted space in the BCCI's hospitality box in Adelaide?" a BCCI official questioned, highlighting the apparent breaches of protocol.
The official further expressed dissatisfaction, asking, "How did he have breakfast in the cordoned-off area of a five-star facility which is just earmarked for the team members?" These instances have sparked debates within the board about maintaining boundaries and ensuring smooth team management.