IND vs PAK: Is Shahid Afridi the main reason behind India players boycotting Pakistan Match in WCL 2025?

Add as a preferred source on Google

As the much-anticipated World Championship of Legends (WCL) match between India and Pakistan was called off, it wasn’t just cricket politics as usual.

A maelstrom of national grief, provocative statements, and personal convictions collided, but is Shahid Afridi is the reason?

On April 22, 2025, Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir bore witness to a horror that claimed 26 innocent lives. The attack, swiftly blamed on Pakistan-based militants, triggered a massive Indian military response—Operation Sindoor—targeting terror camps across the border. As the region simmered, diplomacy evaporated. But in the world of cricket, wounds run parallel: the India Champions team grappling with playing their great rivals just weeks after the massacre.

How did Shahid Afridi provoke during India-Pakistan Tensions?

After the 'Operation Sindoor' from India, Shahid Afridi went no holds barred against the Indian army and government.

Shahid Afridi, the former Pakistan captain notorious for needling the Indian establishment, inflamed passions to a new level. In the aftermath, Afridi appeared on Pakistani television, shifting blame for the massacre back onto Indian security forces:

“Tum logon ki 8 lakh ki fauj hai Kashmir mein aur yeh ho gaya. Iska matlab nalayak ho, nikamme ho na tum log ki security de nahi sake logon ko.”(You have an 800,000-strong army in Kashmir and this still happened. It means you are inefficient and useless if you couldn't provide security to the people.)

Afridi was also seen leading a so-called victory rally in Pakistan after the ceasefire was confirmed between the two nations.

Was Shahid Afridi behind India legends boycotting Match?

For Indian cricket legends, it's not Afridi, the dominoes fell because of a deep love for the nation. Shikhar Dhawan penned a long message and decided to opt out of the match. The others joined in withdrawing, refusing to play against a Pakistan team led in part by Afridi. Organizers, left with no choice, cancelled the marquee fixture.

This wasn’t about runs or wickets. For India’s retired icons, playing on after Pahalgam was non-negotiable. The match became an ethical boundary, and Afridi, through both his play and his provocations, emerged as the face of a rift too wide to bridge. Afridi is a mere character who provoked, it was the disgust of playing Pakistan which made the Indian champions boycott the match, and rightly so.

The Indian players would have played against the entire 11 Pakistani players, not Afridi alone. Hence, the decision stemmed from the union of distrust against a rogue nation, not just a provocative, rogue player.