The debate over who should be the Indian T20 captain has been ongoing, with strong arguments for both Jasprit Bumrah and Hardik Pandya. When former union minister and blue-eyed Parliamentarian Shashi Tharoor was asked because of his deep connection with the game and his powerful narrative skills, he didn't mince words, admitting that Jasprit Bumrah is undoubtedly his best choice.
Tharoor acknowledged Bumrah's intelligence and past captaincy experience in a one-off Test in England and a T20 series against Ireland, but he also noted, "I suspect Hardik has the inside track."

Pandya's consistent leadership in T20 internationals and his experience leading IPL franchises give him an edge over Bumrah. Hardik was set to lead the T20 side after India lost the 50-over World Cup last year to Australia. Even the Mumbai Indians thought Hardik, not Rohit Sharma, would lead India in the T20 World Cup.
However, the Indian cricket board, led by Roger Binney and Jay Shah, had other plans. Shah announced the T20 captain for the World Cup at a function in Rajkot, surprising many, including the Mumbai Indians' owners.
Since then, much water has flown under the bridge. Despite the initial surprise, the dynamics changed with India's victory, and Rohit and Hardik are no longer at odds. Rohit has moved on from international T20 cricket, opening the floor for Hardik to lead India in T20 in 2026.
So, where is Bumrah here? He may have to continue his fabulous work ethics with the ball in all formats of the game. More so, because India has traditionally not favoured having a bowler as a captain, preferring batsmen or all-rounders in leadership roles. This preference is influenced by various factors, including the additional physical and mental demands on bowlers and the strategic oversight required during matches.
Whereas, Pandya’s ability to contribute both as a batsman and a bowler adds balance to the team, which is crucial for a captain. Bumrah, despite being highly respected and having proven his leadership in a few instances, faces the challenge of managing his workload across all formats. The demands on a frontline bowler like Bumrah to perform in critical moments often make it challenging for him to take on the captaincy's additional responsibilities.
Given these considerations, the selectors are likely to favour Pandya. Deep down inside, Rohit also knew this and insisted him to bowl in every World Cup match proved to be a game-changer. Hardik's effectiveness with the ball was pivotal, notably against South Africa, where his performance played a key role in their elimination from the final race. South Africa's collapse, failing to score just 26 runs off 24 deliveries in a crucial final, highlighted their inability to handle pressure.
Currently, the South African team is emotionally disturbed, similar to how Hardik felt when he was booed by Indian fans at the start of the IPL earlier this year. But now, things have changed for good.
Pandya could be all set to be T20 captain of India soon, moving beyond his role as a replacement captain.
Rohit isn't entirely out of white-ball cricket yet, leading to speculation about the potential for dual white-ball captaincy in the Indian team. While the BCCI previously opposed this idea when Virat Kohli wanted to continue as ODI captain while stepping down from T20 captaincy, Hardik's imminent appointment as the T20 captain suggests a possible shift in strategy.