Who Won Yesterday's IPL Match 50: The IPL 2025 season lit up the Pink City on May 1st as the Mumbai Indians (MI) delivered a thunderous statement of intent by bulldozing Rajasthan Royals (RR) in Match 50. Under the floodlights of the Sawai Mansingh Stadium.
MI flexed their might with a masterclass in both power-hitting and clinical bowling, handing RR a sobering 100-run defeat. This commanding performance was led by a blend of brutal batting, spearheaded by Ryan Rickelton and Suryakumar Yadav, and ruthless pace from Jasprit Bumrah and company.

The night began with RR skipper Riyan Parag winning the toss and electing to field—a decision that soon spiralled into a nightmare. Mumbai’s top order blazed away to a daunting 217/2, and in reply, the Royals’ innings crumbled like a house of cards, folding for a mere 117 in 16.1 overs. This emphatic result not only boosted MI’s net run rate but also threw Rajasthan's playoff hopes into disarray.
If cricket had a symphony, Ryan Rickelton was the lead violinist. The South African wicketkeeper-batter turned on the flair, striking a sensational 61 off 38 balls, including seven boundaries and three maximums. He laid a strong foundation with skipper Rohit Sharma, who cracked 53 from 36 balls in his typical graceful style, lacing nine fours to send the Jaipur crowd into a frenzy—albeit most were RR supporters rendered silent.
The carnage didn’t end there. Enter Suryakumar Yadav, who belted a fiery 48* off just 23 balls at a staggering strike rate of 208.70. He was matched step for step by Hardik Pandya, who mirrored the same score (48* off 23), adding fireworks at the back end. Their unbroken partnership was a blistering display of power-hitting that rocketed MI to a monumental 217/2 in their 20 overs.
What started badly for RR never got better. Their batting unit appeared to be batting on a different pitch altogether. The early wickets of Vaibhav Suryavanshi and Yashasvi Jaiswal (out for 0 and 13 respectively) set the tone for the collapse. Skipper Riyan Parag tried to steady the ship but fell for 16, and from then on, it was a procession of wickets.
None of the Royals' batters crossed 20, with the exception of Jofra Archer’s 30—a late flourish that was more for personal pride than team survival. The spin of Karn Sharma and the pace of Jasprit Bumrah proved too hot to handle. The Royals were eventually bundled out for 117, falling short by a mammoth 100 runs.
Each award came with a ₹1 lakh cash prize, and the winners certainly earned it with standout performances:
The match began slipping from RR’s grasp the moment they lost their top three inside four overs. Yashasvi Jaiswal’s early exit was a body blow, but the real turning point came with the back-to-back dismissals of Parag and Hetmyer in the fifth over. The scoreboard read 47/5, and any hopes of a fightback dissolved into thin air.
While Bumrah and the batters hogged the spotlight, veteran spinner Karn Sharma quietly went about dismantling the RR lower order. He picked up three crucial wickets—Dhruv Jurel, Maheesh Theekshana and Kumar Kartikeya—finishing with an economical 3/23 in his 4 overs. It was a textbook display of classical leg-spin, keeping the batters guessing and drying up runs.
Yashasvi Jaiswal, Vaibhav Suryavanshi, Nitish Rana, Riyan Parag (c), Dhruv Jurel (wk), Shimron Hetmyer, Jofra Archer, Maheesh Theekshana, Kumar Kartikeya, Akash Madhwal, Fazalhaq Farooqi
Impact Substitute: Shubham Dubey
Ryan Rickelton (wk), Rohit Sharma, Will Jacks, Suryakumar Yadav, Tilak Varma, Hardik Pandya (c), Naman Dhir, Corbin Bosch, Deepak Chahar, Trent Boult, Jasprit Bumrah
Impact Substitute: Karn Sharma
As the dust settles in Jaipur, Mumbai Indians walk away not just with two vital points but a resounding message to the rest of the competition—they’re peaking at the right time. With their batting firing on all cylinders and their bowlers delivering under pressure, MI’s juggernaut looks well-oiled for the playoff run.
Rajasthan, on the other hand, will be left licking their wounds, urgently needing to re-evaluate their batting combinations and top-order strategy. The loss dents their momentum and underlines the fragility of relying too heavily on a few names.