Notifications
Settings
Clear Notifications
Notifications
Use the toggle to switch on notifications
  • Block for 8 hours
  • Block for 12 hours
  • Block for 24 hours
  • Don't block

Jannik Sinner, Aryna Sabalenka Lead Fight for Bigger Grand Slam Revenue Share

World No. 1 Jannik Sinner has emerged as one of the strongest voices in tennis' growing battle over Grand Slam revenue sharing, with players increasingly frustrated over what they believe is an unfair financial structure at the sport's biggest tournaments.

Speaking at the Italian Open in Rome, Sinner made it clear that the issue is no longer just about elite stars demanding larger prize money. According to the Italian, players across the tour feel they are not receiving a fair share of the massive revenues generated by Grand Slam events like the French Open, Wimbledon, and the US Open.

Jannik Sinner Aryna Sabalenka Lead Fight for Bigger Grand Slam Revenue Share

"It's more about respect. Because I think we give much more than what we are getting back," Sinner said during media interactions ahead of the tournament.

The comments come amid rising tensions between players and Grand Slam organisers after reports suggested that competitors at the French Open would receive only around 14.9 percent of tournament revenues in 2026. Players believe that percentage is too low, especially compared to ATP and WTA events, where revenue distribution models are considerably higher.

The debate has been building quietly for more than a year. Several leading players had earlier sent a letter to the heads of the four Grand Slams requesting a larger share of revenues as well as a greater role in key decision-making processes affecting the sport. However, according to Sinner, little progress has been made despite those discussions.

"It's not nice that after one year we are not even close to conclusion of what we would like to have," Sinner said.

The frustration appears to stem not from the total prize-money numbers themselves, but from the percentage of revenue players actually receive relative to how much Grand Slams generate commercially. Tennis' biggest events earn enormous sums through broadcasting rights, sponsorships, ticket sales, hospitality, and global partnerships, yet players feel their share has not kept pace with the sport's commercial growth.

French Open organisers recently announced a 10 percent increase in total prize money, taking the overall purse to 61.7 million euros. But players argue that the increase does not solve the larger structural problem surrounding revenue distribution.

Sinner suggested the issue has now reached a stage where players feel compelled to speak publicly. "We've been quiet for a long time and now the time has come to raise our voice," he said in Italian.

The 23-year-old also clarified that players are not demanding unrealistic percentages or trying to take control away from tournament organisers. "We're not asking for 50 percent - we wouldn't even dare - but right now we're getting too little," Sinner added.

The issue gained even more attention after World No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka suggested earlier this week that players may eventually need to consider a boycott if meaningful changes are not introduced. While Sinner stopped short of endorsing such action, he admitted the future remains uncertain.

"It's tough to say. I cannot predict the future in a way. But at the same time I also believe that somewhere we need to start," he said.

Attention is now turning toward Wimbledon and the US Open, with players expected to closely watch upcoming prize-money announcements from both tournaments. Wimbledon increased its overall prize pool by seven percent last year, while the US Open announced a 20 percent rise. The Australian Open had already increased prize money by 16 percent earlier this season.

Still, the current dispute suggests the conversation in tennis is evolving beyond simple prize-money hikes. Players increasingly want a long-term system tied directly to tournament revenues, similar to models seen in several major global sports leagues.

Historically, Grand Slam tournaments have operated with significant independence from the ATP and WTA Tours, often leading to friction regarding scheduling, governance, and player welfare. Revenue sharing now appears to be the next major battleground.

With some of the sport's biggest names publicly expressing dissatisfaction, the pressure on Grand Slam organisers is likely to intensify in the coming weeks. And as the French Open approaches, tennis could soon find itself dealing with one of its most significant political and financial disputes in years.

(With Inputs From PTI)

Story first published: Friday, May 8, 2026, 1:56 [IST]
Other articles published on May 8, 2026
Gender
Select your Gender
  • Male
  • Female
  • Others
Age
Select your Age Range
  • Under 18
  • 18 to 25
  • 26 to 35
  • 36 to 45
  • 45 to 55
  • 55+