Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X

Former players slam ICC for boundary-count rule that decided World Cup winner

 New Zealand lost the final due to fewer boundaries scored compared to England
World Cup 2019 - England win maiden WC after dramatic Super Over

New Delhi, July 15: Former cricketers slammed the International Cricket Council (ICC) for its "ridiculous" rule on boundary count that decided the World Cup title in England's favour and denied New Zealand after a pulsating final in London.

In a thrilling encounter on Sunday (July 14) at the Lord's, England were adjudged the winners of the world Cup on the basis of their superior boundary count - 22 fours and two sixes - to New Zealand's 16 after the epic final, and also the ensuing Super Over, ended in a tie.

Opting to bat, New Zealand had put up a modest 241 for eight. In reply, England ended at the same score leading to the one-over eliminator.

In the Super Over, England batted first and the duo of Ben Stokes, who kept the hosts in the game with a brilliant 84 off 98 balls, and Jos Buttler made 15, and New Zealand also ended at the same score but for the loss of one wicket, paving the way for an English victory on boundary count.

Crazy sixes and Super Over drama: How the Cricket World Cup final was won

Former New Zealand cricketers were left hugely disappointed by the ICC's rule, describing it as "absurd" and "unfortunate".

Former Black Caps all-rounder Dion Nash said he felt cheated after the finals. "I feel really empty, and a bit cheated," he was quoted as saying in stuff.co.nz.

"Clearly, it's ridiculous... really absurd. It's about as random as tossing a coin."

England claim World Cup glory in stunning Super Over

Nash, however, said there was no point complaining as the rules were laid down much before the tournament.

"But you also have to look at it from the (view of the) people setting the rules. I mean who thinks it's going to be a draw, and then you draw in the Super Over? What are the chances?

"You can't complain, it was done at the start of the tournament. But I think that's probably indicative of where the game's mindset's at. Why not credit the guys who took the most wickets?

"The real measure that was used for generations was least amount of wickets lost. So why have we changed that?"

Kyle Mills, who was part of the 2015 team which lost its first-ever World Cup final to Australia, felt that the decision could have been on the basis of wickets lost.

"I guess the game of cricket is about runs and wickets and when the runs are tied, it'd be ideal then to take it back to how many wickets were lost," he said.

"It's just unfortunate. Those are the rules, we can't complain."

Meanwhile, few ex-pros, including India's Gautam Gambhir, voiced their opinion via Social Media:

Ridiculous rule – Gautam Gambhir

"Don't understand how the game of such proportions, the #CWC19Final, is finally decided on who scored the most boundaries. A ridiculous rule @ICC. Should have been a tie. I want to congratulate both @BLACKCAPS & @englandcricket on playing out a nail biting Final," Gambhir wrote on his twitter handle.

Disagree with it, but rules are rules – Yuvraj Singh

Gambhir's former teammate Yuvraj Singh also disagreed with the ICC rule of deciding the World Cup winner on boundary count.

"I don't agree with that rule ! But rules are rules congratulations to England on finally winning the World Cup, my heart goes out for the kiwis they fought till the end. Great game an epic final !!!! #CWC19Final," he wrote.

ICC is a joke – Scott Styris

Former New Zealand all-rounder Scott Styris called ICC a joke.

"Nice work @ICC ... you are a joke!!!," he wrote. Former Australian batsman Dean Jones also described the ICC rule as unfair.

"The DL system is actually based on runs and wickets lost... yet the Final result is only based on Boundaries hit? Not fair in my opinion. Must have been great to watch!," he wrote.

Boundaries win the world cup? - Stuart MacGill

"Lovers of cricket turn up for wickets (ENG 10-241, NZ 8-241) AND runs. I love both of these teams but am feeling extremely dissatisfied despite such an amazing match. Shame on all media who fail to highlight the fact that this was a tie. BOOOOOO," tweeted former Aussie leg-spinner Stuart MacGill

Feel for New Zealand – Akash Chopra

"Two consecutive finals. Losing the finals because of fewer boundaries in a TIED game. It's impossible not to feel for NZ. Tough luck, guys. You won a lot of hearts," wrote former India player turned commentator Akash Chopra.

As good as trophy shared – Shoaib Akthar

"OH MY GOD! What a match for a World Cup Final. This is as good as a trophy shared. Match tied, super over tied, England wins on more boundaries hit. Wow. Great scenes at Lords," tweeted former Pakistan paceman Shoaib Akthar.

Sudden death better than boundary rule – Mohammed Kaif

Former India batsman Mohammed Kaif wrote: "Difficult to digest this more boundary rule. Something like sudden death- continuous super overs till a result is a better solution.

"Understand, wanting a definite winner but sharing a trophy is better than deciding on more boundaries. Very tough on New Zealand."

(With inputs from PTI)

For Quick Alerts
ALLOW NOTIFICATIONS
For Daily Alerts

Love Cricket? Prove it! Play myKhel Fantasy Cricket here

Story first published: Monday, July 15, 2019, 13:11 [IST]
Other articles published on Jul 15, 2019
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Mykhel sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Mykhel website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more